New campaign aims for 20% cut in flights
A new campaign was launched in London last night (July 20) to persuade corporates to cut business flights.
The One in Five Challenge by the World Wildlife Fund UK (WWF) is aiming for a 20% cut in business flight by 2014.
Several major companies, among them Capgemini UK, Vodafone UK, Marks and Spencer and Cisco UK and Ireland, have already signed up for the initiative.
Launching the scheme, David Nussbaum, WWWF UK's ceo, said it was the first of its kind in the world and that it fitted neatly into the Fund's aims of tracking climate change and changing the way people lived.
He said carbon emissions had grown by more than four times since the 1950s and there was a global risk of flooding, hunger, malaria and water shortages.
Aviation emissions were growing rapidly and if that rate continued, the rest of the economy would have to reduce its CO2 emissions by 90% to offset it.
He said less flying would save a company costs and make it more profitable, people's productivity would increase, the carbon impact would fall and staff would enjoy greater well being through less travel.
Mr Nussbaum said companies could keep in contact with customers through devices like telepresence.
"Modern technology means that people do not need to do so much flying. People can keep connected without the need for so much flying," he said.
"This is a practical approach to help companies reduce their reliance on business flying.
"It is aimed at lowering carbon emission while staying connected through telepresence, webinars and video conferencing."
Earlier, Theresa Villiers, the UK Conservative shadow spokesperson on transport, said reducing carbon emissions was one of the "most important challenges of our generation."
The scheme, she said, was a "very welcome example of the potential of corporate social responsibility (CSR) could play an important role in tackling climate change."
Ms Villiers said there was a "potential for cost saving in business travel."
There was a case for "reducing the need for business related flying and long distance flying which have an impact on the quality of life."
But she said the "scale of the calamity coming to us" meant there was a need for a "culture shift."
She added: "We need to reduce the need for face to face meetings."
Technology had improved significantly and "companies are going to be focused on the need to adopt technologies like telepresence to save costs and to cut carbon emissions."
James Robey, head of corporate sustainability at Capgemini UK, said the One in Five Challenge complemented his company's aim to cut business travel by 30% by 2014.
Mike Berry, head of sustainable business at Marks and Spencer, said in a statement to the launch that one of its aims was reduce the "carbon footprint of our business travel."
Campbell Gemmell, ceo of the Scottish Environment Protection Agency, said: "By signing up we want to show that not only are we aware of our environmental footprint, but we are actively seeking to reduce it."
Comments
Interfering with our Lives
I knew that these green people would start to advocate measures that ruin the quality of life. They are taking themselves too seriously. It is a myth that man, rather than G-d, controls climate and that CO2 emissions are related to global warming just because both are happening at the same time (a little bit like claiming that switching on TV makes the toilet flush just because lots of people flush the toilet at the same time as others switch on a TV).
I am not going to reduce my travel because of anything the WWF says. We need to stop listening to these dangerous people because eventually, if we listen to them, they will start making suggestions that are fearful - rather like Hitler who ended up killing people to solve perceived problems that were not related to the people he was killing, but his society started to accept his murderous views as fact.
cut business travel
Electric high speed trains are the dirtiest form of travel. They are the worst polluters. They have powerplants blowing 150 grams of CO2 per passenger/kilometer in the atmosphere like volcanoes while cars produce 140 grams per passenger/kilometre. Turboprop aircraft like the Q400, the ATR 72, the ATR 42, the Fokker 50 produce 90 grams per passenger/kilometre and therefore are the cleanest means of transport available. Yet WWF attacks air transport since it believes it is vulnerable, thus making it the culprit. The figures are are published by the highly respectable ICAO. The WWF is simply lying blatantly to the public. Why isn't there anyone to stop them doing so?
Post new comment